INCURE Assist™ › Adhesive Cost Reduction & Second-Source Qualification

Reduce Adhesive Supply Costs with a Qualified Incure Alternative

Incure helps manufacturers qualify technically suitable adhesive alternatives that lower total supply cost, add second-source security, and minimise changes to established dispensing and curing processes — without positioning price above performance.

Why manufacturers migrate adhesives

Most adhesive migrations are not started by purchasing departments hunting for a cheaper glue. They are started by engineers and supply-chain managers dealing with real exposure: repeated price increases on an incumbent brand, a single-source adhesive on a regulated product, minimum order quantities and lead times that no longer fit production, a discontinued grade, or a corporate requirement to establish dual sourcing. The question they ask is rarely “who sells inexpensive adhesive?” — it is “who can qualify as a second source without disrupting a validated process?”

That is the question the Incure Adhesive Cost Migration & Second-Source Programme is built to answer.

Lower total supply cost

Material price, waste, MOQ, freight, cure time and qualification effort — assessed together, not per-kilogram price alone.

Estimate your saving →
Qualified second source

Keep your incumbent approved. Qualify Incure alongside it and remove single-source risk from your bill of materials.

Process left unchanged

Viscosity, fluorescence, cure response and packaging matched to your existing dispensing and curing line.

Dual-region manufacturing

Incure Inc. (USA) and Incure SGP (Singapore) supply the same formulations from two regions, shortening lead times in Asia and the Americas.

Custom formulation

Viscosity, colour, fluorescence, cure speed, flexibility and packaging tuned when a standard grade is not an exact fit.

Minimal revalidation

A structured comparison protocol focuses testing on what actually changes — the adhesive — not the whole process.

How the conversion process works

  1. Submit the incumbent product number. Tell us the current adhesive brand and grade (for example, a Loctite®, Dymax®, Panacol®, Tangent™, DELO®, Permabond® or Master Bond® product number) together with the application. The assessment form takes about five minutes.
  2. Engineering review. Incure reviews substrates, bond geometry, gap, dispensing method, cure equipment and performance requirements against the incumbent's published data.
  3. Candidate identification. The closest formulation is selected from 506 engineered products — 325 UV/light-cure grades, 133 epoxy and high-temperature systems, and 48 instant CA and silicone products.
  4. Adjustment where necessary. Viscosity, colour, fluorescence or cure characteristics are tuned so the candidate runs on your existing needles, valves and lamps.
  5. Samples for evaluation. Evaluation quantities are supplied for laboratory testing and production-line trials, with recommended process settings.
  6. Documented comparison. Incure helps prepare a technical comparison report — published properties, test methods, laboratory results, identified differences and outstanding validation work — to support change control.
  7. Qualification. You qualify Incure as an alternate or primary source on your own test evidence. Volume allocation is then a commercial decision, not a constraint.

What Incure matches — so your line doesn't change

A migration fails when the new adhesive forces process change. The programme therefore starts from process compatibility:

Judge the total cost, not the price per kilogram

Engineers are right to distrust per-kilogram comparisons. The real comparison includes cure time, adhesive consumption per assembly, dispensing losses, purged and expired material, rework and scrap, cure-equipment compatibility, labour, inspection, storage, packaging size, minimum order quantity, freight, lead time, qualification cost and downtime risk. The Adhesive Total Cost Calculator walks through each factor and produces a defensible annual figure. As a simple illustration: a line using 800 kg per year moving from US$220/kg to US$160/kg saves US$48,000 per year in direct material cost alone — before waste, MOQ, freight and downtime effects are counted.

The standard comparison framework

Every Incure migration evaluation uses the same transparent table. Incumbent values are always taken from the manufacturer's published TDS — never estimated — and differences are stated honestly. A technically balanced comparison is more useful to your change-control file (and more credible) than a claim that any product is simply “better.”

Comparison factorExisting adhesiveIncure candidate
ChemistryPer manufacturer's published TDSStated on Incure TDS (e.g. UV acrylic)
Primary substratesPer published TDSStated per grade (e.g. PC, ABS, glass, metal)
ViscosityPublished valueMeasured Incure value
Cure source / wavelengthPublished valueMatched to your installed lamp or LED
Tensile / lap-shear strengthPublished valueIncure laboratory value
HardnessPublished valueIncure laboratory value
ElongationPublished valueIncure laboratory value
FluorescencePublished statusFluorescing and non-fluorescing versions
Sterilisation compatibilityPublished statusStated per grade; verified in qualification
PackagingExisting sizesIncure sizes, matched to consumption
Custom viscosityAvailable
Qualification statusIncumbent (qualified)Evaluation required
Honest wording, by policy. Incure describes candidates as a potential alternative, a candidate for evaluation or a comparable application profile — subject to application validation. Incure does not claim “drop-in replacement” or “identical equivalent” for any product before the necessary testing is complete.

Start from your application

Loctite® UV adhesive alternatives

Category-by-category mapping of common Loctite® UV adhesive applications to Incure candidate families.

View the guide →
Dymax® medical adhesive alternatives

ISO 10993-5 compliant Cyro-Weld™ medical device grades for needle, catheter, reservoir and general device assembly.

View the guide →
PC-to-TPE medical bonding

High-elongation UV grades for bonding rigid polycarbonate to flexible TPE — a classic dissimilar-substrate migration.

View the guide →
Panacol® / Vitralit® alternatives

Medical, electronics, optical and coating applications mapped to Incure UV/LED candidate families.

View the guide →
Tangent™ alternatives

Light-cure medical and industrial grades with a dual-region (USA + Singapore) second-source angle.

View the guide →
DELO® alternatives

Light-curing acrylates and engineering epoxies for electronics, optics and medical assembly.

View the guide →
Permabond® alternatives

UV, cyanoacrylate and epoxy chemistries covered by one supplier review — scope stated honestly.

View the guide →
Master Bond® alternatives

High-temperature, thermally conductive, optical and structural epoxies mapped to Epo-Weld™.

View the guide →
HumiSeal® conformal coating alternatives

UV-curable Ultra-Illumina™ and high-temp silicone Pyra-Sil™ routes for PCBA protection, with fluorescing inspection versions.

View the guide →
Norland optical adhesive alternatives

Index-matched, low-outgassing Optik™ candidates for lens bonding and optical assembly.

View the guide →
Qualification toolkit

Migration checklist, comparison-report format and a sample qualification protocol you can lift into change control.

Open the toolkit →

Frequently asked questions

How can we reduce UV adhesive costs without repeating the entire qualification?
Start from a candidate that matches your existing process. Because Incure matches viscosity, fluorescence and cure response to the incumbent, qualification narrows to a focused comparison protocol — initial and aged bond strength, cure depth, sterilisation where applicable, and a production trial — rather than a full process revalidation. Your quality system still governs the change; the programme just minimises what changes.
Which adhesive can replace Dymax® for PC-to-TPE bonding?
Candidates are selected case by case, but PC-to-TPE assemblies typically need high elongation and biocompatibility. Incure's Cyro-Weld™ medical UV family includes grades such as 5480 (40–80 cP, elongation above 500%) and 5005/5005F (3,400–6,800 cP, exceptional elongation), with fluorescing versions for inline inspection. See the PC-to-TPE guide — all candidates are subject to application validation.
Who can formulate an equivalent adhesive with better pricing?
Incure formulates and manufactures its own chemistry (UV/LED acrylics, epoxies, cyanoacrylates, silicones) in the USA and Singapore, and routinely adjusts viscosity, fluorescence, cure speed, flexibility and packaging to match an incumbent product's application profile. “Equivalent” is always established by your qualification testing, not by claim.
What is an alternative adhesive supplier in Asia or the United States?
Incure supplies from Incure Inc. (USA) and Incure SGP (Singapore). For customers in Asia this typically means shorter lead times and local technical support compared with importing from a single Western factory; for US customers it provides a domestic source with an Asian backup — genuine dual-source security on one qualified formulation.
Do you publish pricing?
Budgetary pricing for all 506 products is available in the INCURE Assist™ portal, including pack sizes and MOQs, so you can build a realistic cost model before you ever speak to us. Formal quotations follow the engineering review.
What if the comparison shows Incure is not a good fit?
Then we say so. The comparison report states identified differences and outstanding validation work explicitly. A migration that fails in production costs far more than it saves, and the programme is designed around that reality.

Request an assessment

Send the incumbent brand, product number and application details. Incure will review the existing adhesive, identify the closest candidate and advise exactly what testing is required to qualify the proposed alternative.

Request an Adhesive Cost-Migration Assessment  Ask the Senior Chemist

Incure product data on this page is drawn from the INCURE Assist™ product database (viscosity in cP; temperature ranges in °C). All third-party trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used only to identify products for comparative evaluation. Incure candidates are potential alternatives subject to application validation; final selection should be confirmed by adhesion testing on production parts.